Wednesday, July 31, 2002
...2002_07_28_nbiermafile_archive.html#79652969
*1 a : of or relating to the alphabet b : alphabetically arranged; 2 : rudimentary
Example sentence: The children recited an abecedarian chant, beginning with "A is for apple" and ending with "Z is for zebra."
The history of "abecedarian" is as simple as ABC -- literally. The term's Late Latin ancestor, "abecedarius" (which meant "of the alphabet"), was created as a combination of the letters A, B, C, and D, plus the suffix "-arius"; you can hear the echo of that origin in the pronunciation of the English term (think "ABC-darian"). In its oldest documented English uses in the early 1600s, "abecedarian" was a noun meaning "one learning the rudiments of something"; it specifically referred to someone who was learning the alphabet.The adjective began appearing in English texts around 1665.
http://www.ombudsgod.blogspot.com/
The Chicago Tribune has just bought Chicago Magazine, continuing its ravenous gobbling of local (and national) media.
Publisher Scott Smith cheerfully announces in a memo: "This acquisition allows Chicago Tribune to continue expanding the ways in which it serves local readers and advertisers in Chicago, just as it does through several other targeted publications it owns and operates."
Underscore the word "advertisers" in the above. The winners in this deal are the Trib's ad sales people, who can now sell meatier ad packages that include space in the Trib and Chicago mag (and WGN TV and radio and...) The readers are losers, since they will get less reporting and writing done by fewer people spread over more media synergistic space, as the Trib and Chicago mag start to share resources.
Meanwhile, what of Steve Rhodes' media column? How can he possibly claim to speak as an independent watchdog of local media? A friend who just came to the Trib from Chicago mag says one of Steve's worries will be having his e-mail address end in "@tribune.com" and then ask for tips. As Romenesko asks, is this the end of profiles of Trib people?
Not to bite the hand that feeds me, but how can the Trib come across as so self-righteous about its ethical hairsplitting on the question of the Ground Zero photographer while smugly plowing ahead with this disservice to its readers, this watering down of their media diet? (And don't get me started one of the all-time major breaches of conflict of interest, the Trib's ownership of the Chicago Cubs...)
I think the blogs-vs-old media story is overblown, largely because when the media reports on itself, the hall-of-mirrors effect magnifies everything. That said, many blogs are a refreshing alternative to the stale and predictable punditocracy, but ... offer no real challenge to the meat-and-potatoes business of news gathering.
- Thank you for your article on the booming interest in NASCAR (NASCAR Nation, July 1). After I started following NASCAR in 1996, I found I did not miss talk of collective bargaining agreements, lockouts and strikes, inflated egos, trade demands, salary caps, athlete arrests and drug use. NASCAR is about real people. The drivers are great role models, and their accessibility to the fans is unmatched in any sport. Can you imagine being able to listen to Shaq's thoughts during a game the way fans can tune into their favorite drivers, via radio scanners, during a race? DEE DEE MULLENIX Las Vegas
- NASCAR may yet replace baseball as America's national pastime, but I wonder if this is necessarily a good thing. In your picture of two bikini-topped fans, I can make out at least five Confederate flags in the background. Somehow I doubt that those flags are being flown only to commemorate the tradition of gentility and charm that the South is known for. How many drivers in NASCAR are nonwhite? NASCAR races are fun to watch, and the drivers are certainly very skilled, but until the sport acknowledges its lack of diversity, I don't think NASCAR deserves all the fawning adulation that it gets. MARK JEANFREAU, New Orleans
Tuesday, July 30, 2002
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-0207300156jul30.story?coll=chi%2Dleisuretempo%2Dhed
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
Sunday, July 28, 2002
Here is an index of highlights (again, using the term generously) from my blog during Blogathon:
...2002_07_28_nbiermafile_archive.html#79508543
I thought I should end by doing a little more explaining about what this blog is about; particularly what you might see when you come back here (don't worry, I'll mostly shelve the metaphysical discussions about the ontological nature of words).
As I said in my Blogathon Guide, I keep my blog 1) as a personal resource for column ideas and links, 2) for writing practice, to keep my writing gears greased, and 3) to try to contribute a little substance to the high-waste world of the blogosphere. My topics include news, politics, media, culture, history, religion, the arts, movies, sports, and anything else that catches my fancy.
I also post e-mail feedback to my stories in the Tribune and elsewhere. Recently I've been posting anecdotes and other quotes from sources I picked up from the cutting room floor when my stories go to print. I find this a fascinating extension of the journalist's job; every other forum I enter, the more accountable and helpful I am to readers, and that can only be good for everyone.
This does raise some interesting questions. Should I be bashing the Tribune Company in my weblog, since they write my paychecks? (Andrew Sullivan was cut loose from the NY Times in part because of his Times-flogging in his blog.) Could someone sue me for defamation of character based on something I post in my blog ?(which laughably assumes I have any wealth worth suing for...) In the meantime, it remains a great outlet for writing and communicating.
Literacy Online calls hyperlinks "the computer's capacity to create such fluid textual structures and present them interactively to the reader," and continues:
The computer as hypertext constitutes a new writing space with qualities unlike those of the previous spaces of handwriting and printing. No longer ancillary to printing, the computer as hypertext earns a distinct place in the history of writing. The shift from printed book to electronic hypertext becomes a watershed as important as the shift from manuscript to print in the fifteenth century.
And although I will bemoan the e-book's eventual corrosion of bound books, I will grant the authors this:
Hypertext calls for a redefinition of the book ... A printed book is an artifact that you can hold in your hand; it is a sequence of pages bound between two covers. Physically and metaphorically, a printed book claims to cover a subject. But in fact no book is complete in itself. Any book contains echoes, references, and often direct quotations, from other books.
And that is why the fluid format of the Web, and weblogs in particular, contain a nugget of promise.
Regard for poetry has slipped a great deal. That is because at its best, with very rare exceptions, even simple and very direct poetry is now quite difficult for most readers. But what is not difficult for most readers? In our society, in which the screen dominates and everything is visual and the flood of information is incessant, teaching people how to read is a major enterprise.
How can one argue that rhetoric, an education built on the word, has regained its centrality when the word itself shows every symptom of radical decline? When the test scores that measure popular literacy worsen each year? When the logos, the long-lasting Western centrality of the word, seems to evaporate before our eyes, and the characteristic Western conception of self and society with it?
Ouch. I actually would make more of a case that the Internet has revived writing in a TV age, but again, I can't argue with the literacy tests and the tripe I've seen on the Web today.
In Quentin Schultze's aforementioned upcoming book, he mentions how Vaschlav Havel came to value reading and writing while a political prisoner in Europe. He was allowed only four pages of written correspondence each week, with the threat of censorship and no promise that they would ever be delivered. Havel writes that he came to treasure each word on each page; he realized what a gift communication was. The danger of blogging is that the easy ability to do it endlessly means we stop caring about words themselves; and judging from many blogs I've seen today, that is exactly what has happened.
This is how I put it to a friend earlier this week in an e-mail: "Words in cyberspace are ephemeral, fleeting, and nonexistent at the push of a button, whereas they were held, pre-Gutenberg, in reverence, and ever since, words on paper have been enduring, anchored on the page, held in the hand."
I suppose some would want to read all sorts of spiritual things into the fact that the founder of Blogathon is an athiest, who posts athiest news headlines at her blog (it turns out she's very sweet to talk to), and although I'm a firm believer in God (it seems to me it takes incredible faith to be an athiest), I'm going to call off those dogs. Here it is the dead of night and I'm talking about the spiritual side of blogging... back to longtime blogger and word treasurer James Lileks to steer us back on course, from an e-mail reply to my question about the McDonald-ization of writing a couple years ago.
This is the golden age of text. More words fly over the net in the course of a day than were published in the entire 19th century. (Rough guess, unscientific.) The level of disquisition isn't great, but for one glorious moment in human history millions of people are banging out millions of words every day and millions of people are reading them. Most of those words, of course, seem to be an effort to prove correct the million-monkeys-typing-Shakespeare-by-accident theory, but if I can judge from the scrawls on the back of my substantial old postcard collection, people have been committing drivel for a long, long time. Chat rooms are nothing but bilge pumps. E-mail is as good as the sender. Web pages permit the publication & dissemination of ideas and projects that would have languished unread just 15 years ago. On balance: it's good. Of course, I ate at McDonald's today, so that should tell you something.
Philosophers of the ancient world and the early Church evolved the celebrated Logos doctrine, best known from the opening verses of the gospel according to St. John: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." Many volumes have been written to explicate the word Logos, but the translation of the Authorized Version is entirely apt. In the Logos doctrine, God is not merely thought to be like language in its most sublime sense, he is equated with it.
Words were worshiped, then, throughout history, for their indirectly or directly divine nature. Perhaps this is what contributed to the sad legacy of written words being the privilege of the elite--the church, the government, the few educated--for centuries. The average person throughout human history, until the 20th, simply did not encounter many words on a daily basis.
This is why my magazine editor in New York I talked to last summer said the bemoaning of the state of reading in an MTV age is off the mark--only very recently in history has mass literacy been the norm; before that people used speech, song and images to communicate. So do people today. So what's the problem?
Here's what I found for the topic of the day: The Psychology of Literacy by Silvia Scribner and Michael Cole, On Literacy by Robert Pattison, Literacy Online by Myron Tuman, Writing Space by Jay David Bolter, and The Electronic Word by Richard Latham. Tidbits of their wisdom, yanked from the page to the screen, to come. As you read, keep in mind the current issue of the transition in medium and what it means for the word (holy cow, I just sounded like a professor or something).
First, from the Psychology of Literacy:
In Plato's day, for the first time in history, a large part of the populace knew how to read and write in an alphabetic script, and the written text was becoming a serious competitor to oral literature as the vehicle for transmitting the cultural store of knowledge. ...
Socrates pointed out that ... letters might weaken memories and lead to forgetfulness, as learners came to rely on external aids for reminiscence. ... Socrates feared that the discovery of the written word would have the show of wisdom (they would know the letters) without the reality (they would not necessarily grasp the true ideas).
Resonant words in a new rhetorical age.
The question is, what does that do to words and how we see them and interact with them? This article from the Tribune late last year is a good, but very limited start:
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79405382
This question of the volume of information in a digital age reminds me of an intriguing piece in the Washington Post a couple years ago on the Library of Congress and its struggle to cope with the mass of data being force-fed down its throat. In some cases preservation or mere retention of data means converting from some delicate physical storage to digital bytes. The mass seems to be too much for the maw.
I fished out the file and put it up at my file site:
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79349894
Back to words and waste, technology and wisdom:
Tech expert David Gelernter on the perils of imagining the Internet will solve school's problems:
The Internet, said President Clinton in February, "could make it possible for every child with access to a computer to stretch a hand across a keyboard to reach every book ever written, every painting ever painted, every symphony ever composed." Pardon me, Mr. President, but this is demented. Most American children don't know what a symphony is. If we suddenly figured out how to teach each child one movement of one symphony, that would be a miracle…It's as if the Administration were announcing that every child must have the fanciest scuba gear on the market - but these kids don't know how to swim, and fitting them out with scuba gear isn't just useless, it's irresponsible; they'll drown.
More at http://nbierma.freeservers.com/writing/onwriting.html
LILEKS, as usual, says it best: "As much as I feel guilty about light bleatage, I've always thought that the phrase "blogging will be light today" is akin to saying "the free ice cream cones will be 27 percent smaller today." It's still free ice cream."
Yep. I actually got cautionary emails from people telling me that I'd lose readers (or worse, "market share," as a couple put it) if I didn't post new stuff daily while on vacation. Oh no -- losing non-paying readers! I love this, but it's a hobby, not a job, and the responsibilities that go with it are those that accompany a hobby, not those that accompany a job.I think that most readers realize that -- but some don't. And a lot of the blogger-critics seem to forget that blogs aren't bigshot media operations that claim to cover all the news that's fit to print and to do so (chortle) in an unbiased fashion, but rather personal operations run in someone's spare time, by people who have an axe to grind and plenty of fury to turn the wheel.That blogs often outperform the big guys anyway doesn't change that. It just makes it sweeter.
There's no rule that says that just because it's the Internet, it has to be lower case, poor punctuation and spelling. Part of it is just the journalist and grammar nut in me, part of it is an attempt to bring some more structure to an often unstructured format. As for the URL's, I like to see what I'm linking to before I go there, and the structure of the tree of a URL is often helpful in seeing what kind of site it may be (front page? main sub-page? random article?) When words are simply highlighted throughout a paragraph, you aren't telling the reader where you're going and why. (I've succumbed to that recently today simply because writing out all the links would bog down the blog. [I just wrote "blog down the bog." Must be after midnight.])
Saturday, July 27, 2002
Seen at a Salon blog recently: "My friend Robert just informed me that the word "blog" is the ugliest word in the English Language. So I changed all references to "blog" to weblog. Thanks Robert."
Not a bad start.
Quote of the day:
"Furious activity is no substitute for understanding."
H. H. Williams
One of the great ironies of the information age is that so many people feel lonely and isolated from others. Years from now anthropologists will probably conclude that our society was media-rich and communication-poor. No society ever had more means of communication, yet no members of a society ever felt so out of touch with one another. Blogging, like personal Web pages and live Web cams, is one way that individuals can speak out and feel like they matter in this impersonal world. Blogging is a public way of saying, "I'm here. I exist. Please acknowledge me!" ...
The problem is that bloggers typically do not see their role as contributing to a shared public life. Instead, they tend to blog as a matter of purely personal and often self-disclosing venting of personal feelings. Too often blogging becomes a strangely public form of talking to one's self about intimate matters, whether faith or personal relationships. The best blogging is truly journalistic--aimed at contributing to the public good, not to personal catharsis. ...
There is no high-tech means to instant friendship of lasting merit. ... In fact, the extent to which we spend time online rather than in person, the weaker our communities will become. We need to be sharing lengthy meals together, walking together, volunteering together, worshipping together and the like--not blogging. We need to revive traditional Christian social practices such as hospitality, friendship, neighborliness and Sabbath leisure. Only if these kinds of practices are strong can we really afford blogging.
Andy Dehnart, whose Web and writing accomplishments I respect, says he likes following certain weblogs where he can encounter different personalities, different dramas and even different characters in the stories that are unfolding in real time. But to me most weblogs sound the same--they're written in the same voice and sound and feel a lot a like. I know there are exceptions. But overall it seems to be digital narcissism--falling in love with your reflection on the screen.
The level of disquisition isn't great, but for one glorious moment in human history millions of people are banging out millions of words every day and millions of people are reading them. Most of those words, of course, seem to be an effort to prove correct the million-monkeys-typing-Shakespeare-by-accident theory, but if I can judge from the scrawls on the back of my substantial old postcard collection, people have been committing drivel for a long, long time.
- MWAHAHAHAH!!! MY EEEEVIL CALCULATIONS WHICH WILL PERMIT ME TO USURP THE ISLAND OF KUDUDU!!! HAIL ME!!!!
- In my continuing campaign to remind you all that life on Earth sucks, here are some articles about space.
- Well here it is, my first post and I have no idea what to write. I guess i will start by reminding you all of what I am all about. I work for a computer software company in the sales department as sales administrator...basically I am the gopher to the sales managers and I sit at a desk all day. If you're ever online between 8:30am-5:30 pm M-F then you'll see me. ... [more droning bio] I just started a relationship technically a week and a half ago and I have never been so scared. I want to trust her and let her into my heart. ... [sentimental drivel] ... I just hope and pray every day that for once my intuition is right.
- I feel like crying. My doom fishie is dead. I am a horrible fish mommy. But I son't know what I did. I didn't do anything differently. But he is dead. He is all floating upside down. But he twitches every so often. And I know dead things do that, but what if he isn't dead? [more unintelligible nonsense] ... Doom fishies are not supposed to die. *sniffle*
- Hey Everyone! I was sitting here thinking.... Hmmmm I need ppl to talk to so I'll stay awake. I don't have many friends (mostly cause I'm a jerk in real life ... So Why not just see if I could get some kind of
contact list goin for all the ppl taking part in the blog-a-thon.
We used technology to get to the moon, now we're doing this.
Nine at night and I just went outside for the first time--that has to be seriously unhealthy at some physical or psychological level. The elevator was as stuffy as a gym bag, but once outside on the sidewalk, the air, though warm, was comfortable. I went to Starbucks with my wife for a caffeine jolt, the first time I've ever been there after sundown. Then we walked down Division between Dearborn and State, a thumping block of bars and the yuppies who make them their habitat. A couple of nutcases were poking their heads out the sunroof of a limo like the mechanical prairie dogs in the arcade game. The proud Hancock stands tall over it all, its necklace of red, white, and blue lights still pulsating through the high night sky. But coming inside to our apartment never felt so cool, or so quiet.
It seems to be a digital projection of the old adage about monekys typing Shakespeare by accident: get enough typers and eventually you'll have brilliance by mathematical probability: "two primates, two computers, and we're already rivaling shakespeare," is the slogan of the blog worldwiderant.
As if to illustrate the principle that if you have enough bloggers eventually you can find anything, I found these Web pages on the mathematical probability of monkeys typing Shakespeare:
Here's one:
It has been suggested that an evolutionist first used the now familiar parable of monkeys typing Shakespeare. "It was, I think, Huxley, who said that six monkeys, set to strum unintelligently on typewriters for millions of millions of years, would be bound in time to write all the books in the British Museum. If we examined the last page which a particular monkey had typed, and found that it had chanced, in its blind strumming, to type a Shakespeare sonnet, we should rightly regard the occurrence as a remarkable accident, but if we looked through all the millions of pages the monkeys had turned off in untold millions of years, we might be sure of finding a Shakespeare sonnet somewhere amongst them, the product of the blind play of chance." (Jeans, Sir James, The Mysterious Universe, New York, Macmillian Co., 1930, p. 4.) More recently, the classic monkey myth was employed by Hawking. After citing the monkey illustration he comments, "very occasionally by pure chance they will type out one of Shakespeare’s sonnets." (Hawking, S.W., 1988, A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes, p. 123) This is absurd. The assertion that the monkeys *will not* in fact perform this feat is as close as we can get to a scientific fact.
There you have it. Here's another one.
The giddy promise is the infinite space of the Web -- you can journal till your techno-heart's content and never get to the bottom of the page. But is that the downfall of blogs as well--the quality is trying furiously but futilely to keep pace with the quantity? It's a losing battle. For Blogathon, bloggers enhance their output, and as I noted before, there's some good stuff going on. But as a phenomenon overall blogging may be about just taking up space.
http://bostonmedia.blogspot.com/
Here's a fascinating article from the Trib a few months ago on the juxtaposition of NBA stars and button-down Moody Bible Institute students, brought together by basketball, from my file site:
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79410611
My best friend Nathan, the Northern Roving Reporter, transports us to the region of the Hudson Bay, at my file site:
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79484316
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79484514
regarding your pondering your lack of outside-the-US travel, I don't think I've got any necessary advantage over you. Before I ever went to China there were many times in America where I felt like a foreigner. I'm sure everyone has felt this. Everyone has experienced what it feels like to be an outsider, to feel like you don't belong, or that people aren't speaking your language, even if it's only in a metaphorical sense. The one thing you do get by leaving the country, however, is a taste of what life would be like without all the little things you take for granted but are an essential part of your sanity. In China, food is a big thing. It's all so strange and so foreign that after awhile, you just want to say, "Enough! Can't you people eat like normal Americans?!" It makes you realize that it's the little things that make life in a foreign country so drastically different. I never thought there was anywhere in the world where you couldn't get good bread, or cheese, for example. I went nuts my first time in China, because neither of those things is readily available. (Apparently they don't appeal to the Chinese palate.) Neither can you get deodorant here; you have to have it shipped from home. Think that pastry looks appetizing? Take a bite. You'll find some delicious red bean paste in the middle. As one commentator has said, in Asia, at some point you begin to lose your inner moorings, and you can either resist it, and going home having not learned anything, or you can let it happen, go some kind of crazy and come home a different person. I think that's a nice summary of learning/growing in general. That's all it is, you grow when you travel, but you don't need to travel to do it.
It was published with the e-mail text in a different font, with Web-ish sidebars along the side with additional bits of information. All this on the same printed page as veteran columnist Bob Greene--it was unusual for a broadsheet. It will be interesting to see how the Trib lays out my article.
Today I'm working from my home, in khaki shorts, shuffling back and forth from the kitchen, talking to my wife, staring out the window. My "office" is my living room. I miss the energy, but the freedom is interesting.
A footnote on the paper question: The NY Times says it publishes "all the news that's fit to print." Actually, it runs all the news that fits in print. Weblogs allow for infinite space and free publishers from the boundaries of physicality.
http://www.ojr.org/ojr/kramer/1026265197.php
And one other thing about paper. A professor of mine has over 12,000 books at his home. What will e-books mean for him? he asks. The word he uses, though, to talk about the timelessness of books, is their "tactile" quality--the feel of holding a book in your hand and flipping the page, sticking a bookmark in between actual pages. I also love the tactile qualities of a newspaper--I fold it under my arm, tear out articles I want to save, underline things, and generally love the feel of it in my fingers. It's like Nicholas Cage in "Family Man"--"I love the feel of a crisp new Wall Street Journal in my hand each morning." Newspapers' value goes beyond simply the information they relate.
More on newspapers on paper in 15 years? Rich Gordon:
There will be a portable news source absolutely; will it be on paper? I think that's hard to answer. Whether electronic devices can take on enough attributes of paper to be a reasonable substitute for paper, if it gets to that point, paper goes away, but so what? It's still a regularly delivered product designed to be read, carried around with you.
Gordon says the NY Times only needs to fear if it is caught off guard by this prospect, and he says it's clear they're readying for it.
I heard Fareed Zakaria, the Newsweek columnist, speak on this subject when he lectured at my college this winter. He said you have to keep in mind the 3 B's: the beach, the bedroom, and the bathroom. That's where people want to read, and so far computers are inferior at facilitating reading in them.
What do you think? New York Times on paper in 15 years?
Andrew Sullivan of andrewsullivan.com:
of course there will. it's just that readers will also want to compare its coverage with lively criticism and rival coverage from the internet. the times won't disappear, thank god. but its monopoly power will be greatly diminished.
The Times sent me this speech by publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., brimming with confidence:
http://www.nytco.com/investors-presentations-20020220.html
and told me there's a bet going over whether weblogs will outrank the Times in "a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007." Martin Nisenholtz, the CEO of New York Times Digital, has bet 1,000 dollars that the Times will win:
Readers need a source of information that is unbiased, accurate, and coherent. New organizations like the Times can provide that far more consistently than private parties can. Besides, the weblog phenomenon does not represent anything fundamentally new in the news media: The New York Times has been publishing individual points of view on the OP ED page for 100 years. In any case, nytimes.com and weblogs are not mutually exclusive. ...
Well, it's not that simple. But take a look:
http://www.longbets.org/bet/2
ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES." The journalism course will cover "copyright issues, the battle over free music downloads and peer-to-peer networks, deep linking to Web sites, etc." and will feature a student-produced weblog that contains articles and other online documents, student's articles about relevant issues, and student commentary. Says Paul:
The course is symptomatic of increased interest in using a weblog as a journalistic vehicle. ... What is going on here is that there’s an interesting form of communicating and providing information that some journalists are seeing if we can adopt without destroying what already exists, with a more professional journalism approach.
One of reasons chose weblog for [this course] is that it seemed like a very interesting and ideal way to try to cover something that has constant breaking news, documents that are avail online such as court opinions or briefs that are being filed, resources you can point people to, and a lot of discussion, and a weblog combines a lot of that. ... We're trying to take some aspects of traditional journalism and blend them into things that have changed in journalism because of the Web and digital networks.
Are weblogs here to stay on campus? "I've seen a lot of other fads come and go," Paul says. "It's hard to say what the traction is. I think they will be around, but how good is it as a learning tool? I don't know."
Gordon helps keep a weblog about electronic media and publishing at Medill's Web site.
What is more common, though, than courses about weblogs are courses that use them.
English 332: Seminar in the Novel at Centenary College in Louisiana, requires students to keep a weblog of their reading (index here), as does Writing Interpretive Papers at Saginaw Valley State in Michigan. Other courses in journalism and publishing use either a group or individual weblogs as assignments for the course.
Last week I interviewed Andy Dehnart, a producer with an online recruiting service in Chicago, keeper of a weblog on Reality TV, and guest lecturer on weblogs at Medill's "News and New Media" course, who says the academic intrigue of weblogs is how they create a new genre of writing:
The format just lends itself so well to a new kind of personal expression, and I really think we're seeing the birth of a new genre of writing and personal narrative within them. There has been journal keeping for hundreds of years, but ... now there's also the fact that you're going to publish to potentially an audience of millions, so it's not exactly writing in a closed space. The diverstiy is unparalleled just because of the web's reach. Plus there's this whole ephemeral nature of it. The writing tends to be more spontaneous, more of a transcript of your thoughts at that moment, which people critized saying there's not thought to it ... but it has a tremendous amount of value, because never before have we seen so many people's thoughts captured instantaneously.
Andy expects the presence of weblogs in the classroom to continue, and to become more of the subject matter:
You'll probably see a lot more interest in issues surrounding blogs: what happens when people you know start reading them, being anoynmous versus actually writing under your own name, can you libel someone in a weblog, will a weblog ever be sued for that. What the academy can bring is not necessarily any validity, because blogs don't need academics studying them to be validated. But the academy brings the ability to research and look into them, explore them and give a good perspective about what's going on and what will be going on in the future.
Rich Gordon, professor of new media at Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism, says the academy is just playing catch-up:
What's happened is a couple years ago, a few people had begun weblogging, but the mainstream press and society didn't realize it was going on. The only people aware of it was the techie community. ... All of the suden in the past 6-12 mo the mainstram media, and society have discovered weblogging, and along with that is a huge proliferation in the number of weblogs.
- Too early to think such negative thoughts. But, I am beginning to question as to whether or not I will make the whole 24 hours. Questions such as "I only have one phone line, what if I sign offline and can't get back on?" and "What if I sleep through the egg timer?" are starting to form in my mind. Eventually, I am going to run out of material, as well.
- What is the quickest way to return to your normal sleeping schedule after the 'thon?
- The best way to do that is to take a 4-5 hour nap after the Blogathon, then, wake up and stay awake until your normal sleeping time, however, go to sleep about 1-2 hours before you usually do. Your mind should be back to normal in 1-2 days.
Ah, the life of a blogathoner...
The discussion continues about which time zone has it best--Europe and Australia start in the afternoon, America's West Coast gets up early in the morning. Here in Chicago we have it about right: 8 to 8 in the morning.
Here's a full list of the highlights:
http://www.blogathon.org/hllist.php
which include these:
A different book review every 30 minutes
http://www.writesofnight.net/blogathon.html
Shoe of the Hour
http://www.stylewithsubstance.com/musings/
10 Movies in 24 Hours
http://www.stennieville.com/blogathon.html
24-hour music webcast, no repeats
http://www.billowing.com/log/
Biography of a different monk every hour
http://www.leeks-and-roses.net/padre/
I interviewed Cat several days ago by phone. She's 37 and lives in Portland, Oregon, working as an automation support specialist (she notes the acronym there) for U.S. Probation, District of Oregon. I asked her how she got started working with computers.
I fell in love with computers when I was a teenager. I'm old enough to remember the first computer show where there was a Commodore 64 and we were all awed by the color screen [laughs]. I thought Tron was really cool. Computers, they still have that magic for me. I still get that thrill of connecting with people from Singapore ... connecting across the globe is a pretty amazing thing for me.
Cat says she doesn't remember how or why she got started blogging, but she does remember hatching the idea for Blogathon:
That was when I first started blogging, I had just been doing it for a few months, and I tend to stay up all night anyway, so I thought, Gee, why don't I just stay up all night and blog, and we'll see what happens. I just did it by myself.
At that time there was a tool out there called Power Bloggers, and a lot of people followed it, and it had updates for the most recently updated blogs, and I blogged every 15 minutes for 24 hours and stayed on the top of that darn PowerBloggers list for the whole time, and got quite a bit of attention, and posted some really weird stuff. I got really tired and started blubbering about my mother.
The anniversary for that came around, and I decided it would be really fun to do it again, but why do it for nothing? Why do it alone? you know It was fun but pointless. that's when I kind of posted the idea to my blog, hey would anyone else do this with me, if I do this for a charity would you sponsor me, and I got some positive responses, and put it all together in a few days, did everything manually--that was quite the chore, thank goodness we've got some automation this year.
Just two years in, and Blogathon, as of 1 p.m. Central this afternoon, has 213 bloggers with 2,125 sponsors, so far raising $52, 446.17 (more than double the number of bloggers and dollars from last year).
It blows me away, it just, yeah, it kind of restores my faith in humanity working on this. The first thing I did to set this up was go through a bunch of charity sites and look at who I wanted to use as suggested charities, and working on this is just so good for my soul, I don't think I'd ever give it up, you know, I get so cynical. It's something that I don't think a lot of people spend their time on the Web just going through charities for a day, and it's very restorative. But the numbers, yeah, the numbers have stunned me. I'm anxious to see how we end up, because usually there's a surge in sponsorships the day of, so we'll see. It's exciting to sit an hit refresh and see people show up.
Like talk radio, the grassroots-ness of blogging seems to have given it a right-wing slant. This has to do, recently, with patriotic reflexes after September 11, and more broadly, with the perception that the media is liberal. I've ranted a lot before (here's a bit ) that while reporters typically vote for Democrats, the function of their work is not necessarily to liberalize the nation (if it were, the media would look at LOT different, and wouldn't make as much money for big corporations). Still, there is a function in grassroots bloggers keeping the institutional media accountable both for reporting errors and what I call cliches of vision--cookie cutter stories that ignore other ways of framing an issue and event.
Andrew Sullivan is usually cited as Exhibit A in the blogging revolution. His blog has thousands of readers a day (one of the few to have more than a hundred hits a day). A former writer for The New Republic, New York Times Magazine, and frequent contributor to the Sunday Times of London, Sullivan supplements his essay writing with daily mini-commentaries and reader e-mail at his weblog. I was first interested in Sullivan when I learned he was an openly gay conservative, which you don't see every day. I've been disappointed, though, at how predictable he has been since September 11--reliably cheerleading for the Bush Administration every time they open their mouths. What's the use of that? InstaPundit, the other major news weblog, is also slanted to the right, but is more flexibile in representing other points of view. The irony is these weblogs have arisen to respond to the narrow-minded institutional media, but liberal blogs like mine are arising to yap at the heels of the massive Weblog-istoctracy of Sullivan and InstaPundit's Glenn Reynold's.
As a blogger for almost a year. I write more for more of personal journaling. Certainly linking to a web is a part of Blogging. It gives your reader a glimpse of who you are. I say your blog is more of a news blog where we can keep up to date on info on what going around in the world around us. But it doesn't really gives an aspect of who YOU are. For me I started blogging out reaction of 9-11 but now I blog because I want to give a unique aspect of who I am as a person. I am a gay asian male and there isn't a lot of us out there. And I have readers that get inspired because they finally found someone that they can relate to. About half of my readership is outside of the United States, so in a sense I am their voice where there is supression of the gay life especially in Asia. That is what blogging is to me.
Chris Chin
I'll respond to this in a second...
My station just started weblogs for some of our photographers. It all started with a sports photographer, who sent in logs while he was on the road during March Madness... and on Tobacco Road, there's plenty to write about. (there'd be more if UNC gets their act together!) Then some of our news photographers wanted in on the act... we just started a few weeks ago... you might drop by... http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/features/070002_FS_photogblogenter.html The photogs really like doing it... and I think it gives some good, behind the camera perspective... but I wonder if bloggers would be pissed about a TV station "institutionalizing" blogging...
Shaun
(Chocolate and more chocolate: Shaun's Blogathon blog is blogonshaun.blogspot.com
Here are the highlights (using the term generously) of my blog so far today:
- Welcome to Blogathon
- Guide To My Blog And Blogathon
- Link of the Day: The World Clock
- Today's Notebook Reader
- Intro to Blogging
- Blogging Going Mainstream?
Still to come: the politics of blogging, blogs and journalism, blogs and college courses, about Blogathon, interview with Blogathon founder Cat Connor, the future of words, your e-mails, dispatches from my friends in Beijing and Northern Canada, and more. See you at noon.
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79476641
Still, the San Fransisco Chronicle will raise the issue of whether blogging is being "co-opted." Others, like Wired magazine ("Blogging Goes Legit, Sort Of"), have as well--all fixated on the fact that a UC-Berkely course this fall will cover weblogs. There are a lot of misunderstandings about this. More on this later, here are the articles for now:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/07/22/blogmain.DTL
http://www.wired.com/news/school/0,1383,52992,00.html
Weblogs are a grassroots phenomenon. They weren't created in a board room and unleashed on waiting consumers. They were created by people with something to say in a format that works well on the Web. With all of the media attention and debate surrounding weblogs, it's easy to lose sight of what they are: people speaking and connecting online. We called this site Blogroots because we feel it's important to keep this grassroots nature in mind.
Blogroots sniffs at the New York Times for its Q&A column yesterday on blogging: "The Times doesn't say who's asking -- chances are they wrote the question as well as the answer." And the site notes William Safire, godfather of Old Media, weighs in on blogging this week in his On Language Column. So it must be official: blogging has made it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/25/technology/circuits/25ASKK.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/28/magazine/28ONLANGUAGE.html
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
Four years ago there were maybe a dozen blogs, two years ago, a couple hundred, and this year Blogger.com alone hosts over 375,000, according to Cat Connor, founder of Blogathon. The word "blog," a crude contraction of "weblog," now appears in an online dictionary of marketing terms.
Some of the original bloggers explain the recent revolution best: Rebecca Blood has written an essay on the history of weblogs and has just published one of the first books devoted to them. Meg Hourihan, one of the founders of Blogger.com, writes about blogs here.
e-mail me
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79474123
Yesterday's Reader
The World Clock will help us keep track of what time it is where people are blogging from, and just how much their body clock is being knocked off course. There's also time.gov for up-to-the-second precision.
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79473097
This is the first time I've ever gone to work in my underwear. I'm sitting at my kitchen table with my laptop in front of me, stacks of notebooks and manilla folders on each side of me, and my wife looking on disapprovingly behind me. I just woke up and opened the blinds, and it looks like the gloomiest day of the week, with the rain tapping a steady rhythm on our air conditioner, so it will be a good day to be tethered to the computer, keeping my weblog, or "blog," for Blogathon 2002. I'm joining 212 other bloggers from around the world who have all agreed to keep our blogs for 24 hours straight, updating them at least every 30 minutes. Each of us is blogging for charity; my sponsor is the Tribune Co., which will donate $100 to Tribune Charities if I make it the whole way. 8 a.m. tomorrow seems an awfully long time away, but as I look at the articles and jottings I've collected around me, my thought isn't, how am I going to make it, but how am I going to write about everything I want to write about in a measly 52 posts?
Friday, July 26, 2002
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-0207260354jul26.story
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
"I get picked on pretty bad. People say: 'You got knocked down by a fish?' It's not any ordinary fish. It's a huge fish."
Tallahassee boater Danny Cordero, victim of a leaping sturgeon (you have to read it to believe it):
http://sptimes.com/2002/07/26/State/Leaping_sturgeon_beco.shtml
http://archives.theglobeandmail.com/...
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79448637
Yesterday's Reader
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2904-2002Jul25.html
Thursday, July 25, 2002
This Los Angeles Airport Monitor tracks airplanes by moving them across a map in real time. Zoom out to 96 miles and they look like ants swarming a picnic crumb. There's one for Atlanta, too.
AP writeup at my file site:
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79403427
"You can [blame] a little bit of it, maybe, on the heat. People being confined in their houses, which may or may not have air conditioning."
East St. Louis Police Chief Delbert Marion on what the heat wave has to do with an increase in domestic violence, thus connecting the unconscionable assault of women with the thermometer.
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/...
And, speaking of Starbucks, I noticed the NY Times navbar is now sponsored by the proliferating coffee peddlers. Sheesh!
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/25/international/25POWE.html
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79400787
As baseball players march obliviously and self-righteously toward a strike that could bankrupt several franchises and eliminate 20 percent of the jobs in their industry, they are, from all evidence, wrestling only with exactly when to threaten to walk out. Sources disagree on the logic patterns, and even the process of selection. But they are uniform in reporting that the players are terrified of the public reaction should they actually be out on strike on Sept. 11.
http://www.salon.com/news/sports/col/olbermann/2002/07/25/strike/index.html
http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0,1640,41189,FF.html
http://www.suntimes.com/output/sneed/cst-nws-sneed25.html
My family and my wife have been, among them, to London, Paris, and Germany in the past few years. I've lived in New York and Chicago and considered that a big deal for a Grand Rapids native. But as my college courses, and now my job, have taken me into the thick of cultural studies, I've been thinking--do you have to have a sustained international experience to best view American culture? I try to think of myself as a skeptical, creative, and constructive cultural critic. But can you really do it without removing yourself? The problem may be complicated by the fact that I'm living in the heart of Chicago and loving it--I eagerly immerse myself in the city each day. Then I consider my friend Will who's spending the summer in Beijing, and my best friend Nathan, who has been living in the Northwest Territories, and I realize--they have the most sincere skepticism of their native cultural contexts, not to mention the most compelling praise. I promised my wife I'd take her to London within ten years; I wonder how my work and my worldview will change when I follow through on it.
Wednesday, July 24, 2002
Long Bets ponders several long-term possibilities and offers yes and no arguments. The topics range from the metaphysical (By 2020, someone will win a Nobel Prize for work on superstring theory, membrane theory, or some other unified theory describing all the forces of nature click here) to the classic sports bar wagers (The US men's soccer team will win the World Cup before the Red Sox win the World Series--Ted Danson weighs in on this one! click here)
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/23/business/worldbusiness/23SMOK.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/17/opinion/17COLM.html
And today's letters to the editor in response to the column:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/24/opinion/L24HUSB.html
(use member name and password of "nbiermaread")
http://tvguide.com/magazine/robins/020722.asp
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2000/0006.robbins.html
...2002_07_21_nbiermafile_archive.html#79353376
I thought of that this morning while walking down the Magnificent Mile to work on a cool summer morning--a dream I never wanted to wake up from. While this glamorous stretch of Michigan Avenue is enjoyable, I (and most Chicago purists) bemoan how it is an artificial tourist construct--a pseudo-world tourists visit and then tell themselves they've been to Chicago. The city's true riches, seldom explored, are its historical neighborhoods South and West, in Oak Park, in unmarked lots (such as the one where the famous Haymarket Riots took place), and these are anything but touristy. And yet. Walking down Rush and then Michigan today I saw the most normal sights you can see--a doorman at a hotel, perhaps a student spending his summer lugging bags for the snooty; a worker hosing down the sidewalks of a streetside cafe, the security guards and cleaning ladies in the cathedral-like Tribune Tower where I, in awe, work. Ordinary people with ordinary stories, sadnesses, and delights, and ordinary energies as they carried them out (although city life does add a bit of a spark to people's step), despite their seemingly magical surroundings. But when I say "ordinary" I don't mean to drain the drama from these people's lives; as I writer, I'm convinced that each person is a book waiting to be written.
He had nothing to do with it. Nothing. You do not attack civilians based on the Qur’an. You don’t commit suicide based on the Qur’an. As it became more and more clear that Osama bin Laden had done all of this, John wanted to get out of [Afghanistan]. He wanted to go home. But he couldn’t for fear of death. You don’t hail a cab when you’re fighting with the Taliban up there.
Brosnahan is more than a little paranoid, blaming the brouhaha about his client on a post-9/11 squelching of civil liberties. I mean, this guy was with the Taliban. Still, it's worth pointing out that until about last October, the Taliban, though not on our Easter basket list, was not an avowed enemy of the U.S. as was the Al Qaeda mob. People are acting as though this guy was having beers with Osama, or worse.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/783504.asp
Tuesday, July 23, 2002
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/23/international/europe/23SWED.html
(use member name and password of "nbiermaread")
http://viking.no/e/people/leif/e-leiv.htm
http://www.weather.com/weather/local/USIL0225
http://www.suntimes.com/output/osullivan/cst-edt-osul23.html
Also in today's paper, Richard Roeper does a nice job of dismantling the rabid assaults of Ann Coulter:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeper/cst-nws-roep23.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/22/technology/22NET.html
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
Monday, July 22, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/convs/dsiteselect.html
http://www.ci.detroit.mi.us/ccsd/Releases/pr052322.htm
http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/files/072202.html
About Me
Labels
- 4 (14)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(559)
-
▼
July
(153)
- Chicago architecture watch: The Trump Tower is bac...
- Today's edition of my Notebook Reader, a daily dig...
- Number of the day: 400: Americans who die each yea...
- Word of the Day, from M-W: abecedarian \ay-bee-see...
- So there's an ombusdman for ombudsmen. Who knew? M...
- ANOTHER BLOW IS STRUCK AGAINST MEDIA INDEPENDENCE:...
- Cleaning out my notes on blogging, here's a Time I...
- Letters to Sports Illustrated about its recent NAS...
- My latest story for the Tribune: http://www.chicag...
- Thought of the day: More Blogathonning, please! 48...
- That's it. I made it 24 hours straight. Tribune Ch...
- The end is in sight. The light at the end of the t...
- One last angle to explore here on the question of ...
- My friend Nathan once mentioned that one of the ca...
- Hunger is clawing at my insides. I just looked out...
- Relevant clipping from Time magazine a week or two...
- From The Electronic Word How can one argue that rh...
- Back to reverence and words--when there are fewer ...
- This notion of the divinity of the word is intrigu...
- From On Literacy, an engaging sociological history...
- I knew I'd be thinking about this topic of the fut...
- I'm staring to feel weak--I'm running on pizza, ma...
- This words and waste question unfurls a deeper que...
- As I've said, the most mind-boggling thing about t...
- I think I'm catching my second wind. I don't feel ...
- Instapundit, writing the other day about another b...
- I just got done watching Rain Man with my wife, wh...
- You may have wondered, why do I insist on proper c...
- For the most part, it's been fun though. And I'm n...
- I may have come across as a little snide about blo...
- The word blog itself suggests, by onomatopoeia, th...
- 11:30 and I'm already yawning. 8 a.m seems about 1...
- Quentin Schultzemy professor and author of the for...
- The question of wasteful blogs may seem like a so-...
- A couple years ago I posed the issue of words and ...
- Part of the reason I asked whether blogs were all ...
- And the 9:30: Nine at night and I just went outsi...
- OK, the 9:00: It seems to be a digital projection...
- AOL just crashed--I'm actually stunned this is onl...
- The halfway point seems as good a time as any to r...
- 24 posts, and only halfway home! It's going to be ...
- Since blogging is like talk radio, you would expec...
- One last (hah!) thought on the print news/weblogs ...
- Thank goodness for supper. I've hardly eaten all d...
- Will has written up a strikingly thorough analysis...
- My friend Will checks in from Beijing: regarding ...
- This weblog itself is an interesting convergence o...
- In the discussion of newspapers on paper and on th...
- The other thing about this question is that weblog...
- I just stepped out into my apartment hallway, wher...
- The newspaper on the desk beside me still has me t...
- I've transferred to my desk by our bay window, whi...
- I spoke yesterday by phone to Paul Grabowicz, who ...
- More on blogs on campus: Gordon helps keep a weblo...
- I'm going through my notes on weblogs and the acad...
- Overheard on the Blogathon bulletin board: - Too ...
- Trying to coherently summarize how Blogathon so fa...
- Just got an e-mail from Cat Connor, founder and ma...
- THE POLITICS OF BLOGGING: Like talk radio, the gra...
- Let's open the mailbag: As a blogger for almost a...
- I'm finally going to break for that breakfast and ...
- Another twist on the mainstreaming question: blog ...
- I'm also wondering, is there something inherently ...
- So this raises the question, is blogging going ma...
- Oh, and I forgot Salon, which just launched its bl...
- I just picked up today's Tribune; I've been online...
- Blogroots.com on blogging: Weblogs are a grassroo...
- Diaries have been around for centuries, stuffed un...
- I'll be trying to extract much of the mundanities ...
- Here's today's edition of my Notebook Reader, a da...
- I need breakfast and a shower. I was hoping to hav...
- Link of the day: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldc...
- I just posted a little Guide to My Blog and Blogat...
- BLOGATHON BEGINS: This is the first time I've ever...
- Tomorrow is Blogathon! I'll be posting at least ev...
- Quote of the day: "I get picked on pretty bad. Peo...
- Number of the day: 30,000 Gallons of sewage disgor...
- Here's my Notebook Reader for today, a daily diges...
- John Madden's new deal with ABC means he'll also b...
- President Bush will give an exclusive interview th...
- Link of the day: http://www1.passur.com/lax.html T...
- Number of the day: 30: Percent drop in tourism at ...
- Rob Lowe leaves West Wing: From the beginning he w...
- Quote of the day: "You can [blame] a little bit of...
- Leave it to the testosterone-pumped, give-em-hell ...
- Today's installment of my Notebook Reader, a daily...
- I said earlier this week that I was keeping an eye...
- The Starbucks-ization of the world: Business 2.0 b...
- Here's a twist: Joe Lieberman has been wearing a g...
- Thought of the day: the need to be outside the box...
- Link of the Day: http://www.longbets.org/ Long Bet...
- The main product of Taiwan's government-owned Toba...
- I meant to post this with my marriage rant the oth...
- My ongoing series on why I'm sometimes embarassed ...
- My best friend Nathan is an adventurous journalist...
- Thought of the day: Finding the ordinary-ness in t...
- James Brosnahan, attorney for John Walker Lindh, o...
- I suppose it's a trivial detail in a sad, strange ...
- Thought of the day: The spiritual function of temp...
- John O'Sullivan in today's Chicago Sun-Times "When...
-
▼
July
(153)