This feeds my mixed feelings about Sex and the City, a quality show that is almost as well-acted as it is well-written, although at times alarmingly shallow in scope and content. On the one hand, the characters speak honestly and wrestle with the gap between how marriage has always been billed to them and what they actually find it to be, which is a crucial conversation to share with women who are told the significance of their existence hinges on their marital status. "Do we really want these things," Carrie asks after breaking out in a rash while trying on a wedding dress, "or are we just programmed?" On the other hand, it is disturbing to see how these characters' neuroses and even narcissism leads them to sabatoge functional and fulfilling relationships with men--it's as if their lost faith in traditional relationships becomes a continually self-fulfilling prophecy. If doubt about marriage means such self-centeredness, than you begin to have doubt in the doubt itself.
A useful and unusually skeptical review of the show in Sunday's Chicago Tribune by Steve Johnson (who reports this morning that he already has a flood of angry e-mails about the piece),
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-0207210341jul21.story
(log in with member name and password of "nbiermaread")
and as a counterpoint, a review from PopPolitics.com praising the show's second thoughts about marriage:
http://www.poppolitics.com/articles/2002-07-14-singlewomen.shtml
And then there's IndieBride.com, the anti-bride's declaration of independence from ancient bridal values.
http://www.indiebride.com/ourvow/
No comments:
Post a Comment