Nathan's Notebook
|
||
|
---by
Nathan Bierma
About:
Book: Column:
My Blogs:
Friends:
Recent Posts:
Less Recent Posts:
Strands:
Interests:
Interviews:
Archives:
|
NBierma.com > Notebook
Wednesday, November 10, 2004
This week in my B&C blog: A roundup of recent articles on philosophy and reason in America today, including the Sopranos-and-Philosophy craze. LINK/ARCHIVE My latest Tribune language column:
On a new kind of sentence fragment in TV newscasting: so-called "ing-lish." Plus: Overheard on Election Night; Tom Brokaw's pronunciation. temp link/perm.preview My closing line on "ing-lish" was cut: For the viewer already dizzy from all the news crawls, instant online polls and ever-shrinking sound bites, it's getting harder to tell the difference between what has happened, what is happening, and what will or may happen in the future. These days, everything seems to be happening at once. However, if you really dig grammar (God bless you!), you know that this line, and my line about "putting everything in the present," are regrettably misleading. Absolute phrases and gerunds have NO tense--they are non-finite, since they do not specify tense, agent, and number. There's a good, clear breakdown of this at I.G.O.E. My English professor's more thorough explanation is here. He adds a few common absolute phrases: "all things considered, all other things being equal, God willing..." This essay at News Lab and this PBS segment suggest the phenomenon has something to do with "dropping the verb," but in fact only the auxiliary verb ("is," "have been," etc.) is dropped; the verb remains in something resembling absolute form. More on newsspeak here and on Election Night here. Transcript of CNN's 7 p.m. hour of Election Night here. The Seattle Times on how the media can get it right next time. And more Ratherisms. I was really interested by David Gergen's "locust of lawyers." Here's more: locusts United Press International October 15, 2004 Friday HEADLINE: Analysis: Will lawyers decide the vote? BYLINE: By MICHAEL KIRKLAND Like a biblical plague of locusts, lawyers are gathering by the thousands at the call of the Democratic and Republican parties to handle voting-related court challenges both before and after the Nov. 2 presidential election. Election Integrity At Stake By George F. Will Sunday, October 24, 2004; Today's worry concerns a cloud of locust-like lawyers asserting novel theories that purport to demonstrate that sensible rules, such as requiring voters to have identification, are illegal, even unconstitutional. This locust litigation will erupt around any close election -- any not won beyond "the margin of litigation." link CNN: GERGEN: What the attorneys will be looking for is the same thing the monitors will be looking for. And both sides will have them out in force. As George Will called them, the locust of lawyers. Inflections: • Slogan of the Nader campaign, qtd in the Chi.Tribune: Bush and Kerry make me want to Ralph. • "'Wal-Mart Republicans' is probably more accurate [than "Religious Right"], given that Bush's majority was built up in the same kinds of small communities where the world's largest retailer thrives." x • "I have to admit that I am a little confused by all this talk of 'man date' by Republican leaders in the days since the election. I thought they were opposed to same-sex fooling around." x (more on mandate) • This was from a rerun of either Seinfeld or Sex in the City, I forget which: To boyfriend: "Here's the thing." Bf: "Oh no, not the thing! I hate the thing." • A word from WorldWideWords I want to save: sonofusion • My wife spotted a flyer nailed to a phone pole that said "Found: Lost Cat." "It's not really lost anymore, is it?" she observed. On the other hand, the alternative is posting a flyer that says: "Found: Cat That Had Been Lost At The Time We Found It But As Of Its Finding Is No Longer Lost" • Someone found this blog by doing a search for the architect of the "ifill tower." (I had posted a quote from the debate moderated by Gwen Ifill, and said something somewhere about a tower, so voila.) I wonder if that surname was originally someone's attempt to name their family after the famous landmark? I doubt it; the name is probably older than the tower. • "If "The Incredibles" did not exist, it would be necessary to invent them," wrote the Tribune. This is approaching cliche territory, suggests a quick search for "If x did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him/her/them." • Googling my name (everyone's entitled now and then), I found this post from a Lon Bierma, my relation to whom (if any) I don't know. From: Lon Bierma • Previous column and inflections • Etymology Today from M-W: nexus \NEK-sus\ 1 : connection, link; also : a causal link 2 : a connected group or series 3 : center, focus "Nexus" is all about connections. The word comes from "nectere," a Latin verb meaning "to bind." A number of other English words are related to "nectere." The most obvious is "connect," but "annex" (meaning "to attach as an addition," or more specifically "to incorporate into a political domain") is related as well. When "nexus" came into English in the 17th century, it meant "connection." Eventually, it took on the additional meaning "connected series" (as in "a nexus of relationships"). In the past few decades it has taken a third meaning: "center" (as in "the trade nexus of the region"), perhaps from the notion that a point in the center of an arrangement serves to join together the objects that surround it. • Previous E.T. Red and Blue America? Nope
George Bush is already proclaiming a mandate, for chrissakes. If the narrow margin of victory in this election had swung the other way, does anyone doubt for a moment that an army of Republican surrogates would have immediately fanned out to the shouting-head shows to argue, until they were collectively blue in the face, that the election of John Kerry was nothing more than a statistical fluke that certainly carried with it no greater meaning? "I'll reach out to everyone who shares our goals." - George W. Bush, 11/4/04 Now that's conciliatory! "How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?"
'Tis the season--yes, already--for Christmas decorations. I did this brief for Chicago Tribune Magazine last year: Q: ARE RETAILERS STILL PUTTING UP CHRISTMAS DISPLAYS EVER EARLIER? My column on Christmas Web sites Posted without comment... For a leap of faith, that's the breaks Is this true? The wretches who roam around aimlessly in gangs and kill people by throwing stones from a highway bridge or setting fire to a child--whoever these people are--turn out this way not because they have been corrupted by computer "new-speak" (they don't even have access to a computer) but rather because they are excluded from the universe of literature, and from those places where, through education and discussion, they might be reached by a glimmer from the world of values that stems from and sends us back again to books. -Umberto Eco, On Literature Last month was National Novel Writing Month. Yeah, like there aren't enough poorly written novels around. Napoleon was, in writing, at least, quite the Romeo, according to the new book The Linguist and The Emperor: I have awakened full of you. The memory of last night has given my senses no rest... Sweet and incomparable Josephine, what an effect you have on my heart! I sent you thousands of kisses---but don't kiss me. Your kisses sear my blood. p26 G.K. Chesterton on journalism: We announce on flaring posters that a man has fallen off a scaffolding. We do not announce on flaring posters that a man has not fallen off a scaffolding. Yet this latter fact is fundamentally more exciting, as indicating that that moving tower of terror and mystery, a man, is still abroad upon the earth. That the man has not fallen off a scaffolding is really more sensational; and it is also some thousand times more common. But journalism cannot reasonably be expected thus to insist upon the permanent miracles. Busy editors cannot be expected to put on their posters, “Mr. Wilkinson still safe” or “Mr. Jones, of Worthing, not dead yet.” link Nation's Poor Win Election For Nation's Rich x Kerry Captures Bin Laden One Week Too Late x Nation's Wildlife Fleeing To Canada Self-Help Book Believes It Can Be A Bestseller Someday x wdyt: "Our nation may be bitterly divided, but at least our government can agree on being ultra-conservative." "Now that the Republicans run Congress, the White House, and soon the Supreme Court, they'll just have to invent some new branches of government to dominate, as well." "The fact that 48 percent of Americans voted for a boring placeholder like John Kerry is actually a really good sign for the Left."
|
|