I liked the
Sex and the City series finale overall. A little predictable, but it struck a decent balance between resolving storylines and setting up the upcoming movie. Miranda's resolution was the best--a poignant full-circle arrival from her prickly first-season self. Still, I was unsettled by how a show that purportedly glorifies singlehood couldn't rest until each character was paired up: Carrie with Big, more or less; Charlotte and Miranda finding husbands and embracing family values; and even Samantha settling in with a steady. The writers have always suggested that they prize good character development over good feminism, but I wonder what subtle messages the finale sent to single viewers about their social adequacy.
Steve Johnson puts it this way this morning in a negative
review, talking about Carrie taking back Big:
Isn't rejecting a man who had delivered her so much maltreatment what a truly modern woman would have done?
Yesterday, the NY Times ran a
conversation about whether or not Carrie should get married.
And here's my earlier essay on
Sex and the City and belief.
No comments:
Post a Comment