"The Catcher in the Rye" is now, you'll be told just
about anywhere you ask, an "American classic," right
up there with the book that was published the
following year, Ernest Hemingway's "The Old Man and
the Sea." They are two of the most durable and beloved
books in American literature and, by any reasonable
critical standard, two of the worst.
Wednesday, January 05, 2005
Clipped from the Washington Post a while back:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Labels
- 4 (14)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(58)
-
▼
January
(17)
- This week in my B&C blog: Why the United States i...
- My latest Tribune language column: Why "he or she"...
- This week in my B&C blog: Things scientists and p...
- My latest Tribune language column: On the religiou...
- Our pastor asked recently, in an anecdote about th...
- Here's something you don't read every day, from th...
- Number-crunching from The Week: - The day after P...
- This week in my B&C blog: Why civilizations colla...
- My latest Tribune language column: On the Year of ...
- From the NYT: But the parade of broadcast journa...
- My sister Lisa has a blog! Drop everything and boo...
- My latest Tribune language column: A preview of PB...
- Why Star Wars is better than Titanic; quotes, and ...
- Sez Eric Zorn: Why all the celebratory stories ev...
- They did call him Slick Georgie, didn't they? Yes...
- Clipped from the Washington Post a while back: "...
- My dad: the coolest Calvinist scholar I've ever wa...
-
▼
January
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment